Article 13: Investing in Debt Markets and Instruments

Aug 1, 2019


This is our thirteenth Article and the first of five of a ‘mini-series’ on bond markets. In China, individual investors tend to prefer to invest in equities and real estate. But the bond market is a sector that we expect to grow in the coming years along with bond funds so that more individuals will invest in this sector. This first article of five, is intended to give an overview of bond markets in general and will be followed with four more specific articles:

14. Valuing Bonds and Money Market Instruments

15. Understanding the Yield Curve

16. Credit Risk and Corporate Bonds

17. Structured Securities

Characteristics of Debt Securities

There are a great many sources of financing to a corporation, but they largely fall into one of two categories: debt and equity. This can be illustrated by looking at the Balance Sheet of a corporation (Figure below). The left-facing column lists the assets (investments) of a company and the right column lists the sources of financing. Sources of financing may include bank loans and trade credit provided by suppliers. However, debt and equity securities are two very important long-term sources of financing. There are, however, some key differences between debt and equity from the perspective of both the issuer of securities and its investor. Both are financial assets or securities, but they have two, key differentiating characteristics. From the perspective of debt, we can say:

1. Debt has a “promise to pay”, a legal commitment to meet some payment schedule in a timely manner and failure to meet a payment has serious legal consequences, such as the company going into bankruptcy. Payments under equity, however, are completely discretionary; management decides at the end of the fiscal year whether or not they will declare a dividend. Although management may have a desire to pay dividends there is no legal consequence to not paying them. As a consequence, equity provides a corporation with much greater financial flexibility, but this translates into greater uncertainty and risk to the investor.

2. Debt has a repayment of principal. As the value of any security is simply applying time-value-ofmoney calculations to forecasted or promised future cash flows, repayment of principal greatly adds to the certainty of valuing debt, relative to equity and dividends.

The above two characteristics are what make the risk and return of debt versus equity very different. The discretionary nature of dividends allows management to greatly reduce its financial risk but this translates into a source of higher risk to the investor, for which they demand a higher expected return. The payment schedules committed to by issuers of debt at launch also greatly reduce the uncertainty in the discounting of the cash flows. There may, as we will see in Article 16, be credit risk; the issuer may not be able to meet its promise to pay. But putting that aside we have amounts and dates to work with making the valuation process much less uncertain. That is why bond valuation models appear to be so much more quantitative than the “simpler” equity valuation models. In equity, there is less value in trying to forecast dividends and payment dates with the same level of detail as the uncertainty makes the exercise not worth the additional effort.

“Plain vanilla” bullet bonds

A bond is a debt obligation. The investor who buys a bond is a lender and the organization that issues the bond is a borrower. The debt obligation is securitized so that the bond can be traded on the capital markets (securitized in that it is a legally transferable instrument). When contrasting equity and debt above we are implicitly looking at a debt instrument that we refer to as a “bullet bond”, in that coupons are paid based on fixed amounts and principal is repaid at par at maturity. We know that not all bonds are bullet bonds where all cash flows are specified in money terms. Some bonds will index the payments (coupon and principal) to some public index such as the price of oil, a stock index value or an index of inflation (this example is looked at in Article 17). Here the “promise to pay” is not made in cash terms but adjusted by a formula. Note that payment dates will likely remain fixed.

We also know that some bonds are “hybrid” in that they come with an option embedded in them.

The most common example is the callable bond (covered in Article 17) where the issuer of the debt has the right to call the bond under prescribed terms. And we know that there are “perpetual” bonds that have been issued and don’t have a maturity date and so make no commitment to return principal.

Although we can find exceptions to the two key characteristics of debt as introduced above, it is nevertheless, the case that the bullet bond is the most common form of debt, for corporations and governments and is the best starting point for studying fixed income securities. Clearly, when this area of study is mastered then turning to the various hybrid and structured securities is important, but we find the basic principles remain the same.

Bond markets are based on ‘conventions’ or rules about how to calculate values of accrued interest. There will be ‘day-count conventions’ that stipulate the actual way you will calculate interest and, thus, price and your investment return. We will defer this detailed mathematical discussion for Article 14.

Money Market and Bond Market

The asset class of “debt” actually encompasses many different types of financing. It can be short-term credit provided by a supplier or bank. It can be a leasing arrangement of a capital good purchased. But our focus is on financial securities, those financial contracts that are actively traded between investors around the world.

We find two very different areas within debt securities: money market and the bond market.

The money market and the bond market are two markets that have been segmented by convention and regulation. The 12-month cut-off probably originates from annual corporate statements being based upon a year and the accounting convention of short-term (≤1 year) versus long-term (>1 year).

However, some material practical distinctions exist between these two markets, the most important one being discount versus coupon bearing instruments. Day count conventions also may differ between money and bond markets in the same country or currency. For example, bond interest is calculated using an “actual/actual” basis whereas money market instruments use an “actual/360” convention. It is not worthwhile to try and understand why different conventions have come about; they are simply a product of history.

Discount versus coupon bearing instrument

This is an important distinction between the two sectors that impacts the valuation formula. As we will see later, the concept of “reinvestment” is very important in bond valuation. It means that during the life of the security there will be interim payments that can be invested to earn additional return. This is the case with most bonds and hence valuation models need to take the reinvestment into consideration. Money market securities typically don’t pay interim payments and so the issue of reinvestment is not relevant. When reinvestment is not present and for periods of less than one year, we can then apply a concept of simple interest (i.e. no compounding) in calculating a price or rate of return. These differing conventions will be fully explained and illustrated in Article 14.

OTC and exchange traded markets

A market is a mechanism for buyers and sellers to interact in a convenient and cost-effective manner. Markets have several important characteristics:

  • a market need not have a physical location
  • the market does not take ownership of the goods being traded
  • a market can deal in whatever goods it chooses

Two important market structures have traditionally been exchanges and over-the-counter (OTC) markets, although technology today is creating new hybrid markets that don’t fall neatly into either one of these two definitions. These different structures have an impact on how the market functions in terms of price transparency and, also, settlement.

  • exchanges will normally have a public reporting duty, which some argue, makes prices more transparent
  • exchanges will often be associated with a Clearing House that serves as a single and central entity to clear all trades and stand as legal counterparty in every transaction

Bonds and OTC markets

Although in some jurisdictions bonds have to be listed on an exchange for an investor to purchase them, most bonds are traded OTC. By not following the more detailed rules laid down by exchanges, market participants sometimes assert that OTC market are less regulated, which encourages a freer flow of capital. OTC markets are certainly less standardized than exchanges with their many rules for market size, trading limits and trading days. Yet the trade-off is often price transparency; when markets become illiquid finding a “market price” may become more difficult.

The lack of a centralised clearing house (CH) certainly increases counterparty settlement risk. Although a CH can, of course, default they are usually well capitalised entities with good credit ratings. The one benefit they do provide is that a market participant only need concern itself with the credit assessment of one counterparty, the CH, and not the great many they might deal with in an OTC market. Thus, all other things equal, settlement risk is likely to be higher in the bond market that is largely OTC.

China’s Bond Markets

The bond markets in China have grown greatly over the last ten years, in line with the high level of economic growth. China’s overall bond market (for all types of issuers) is now the second largest in the world, after America. Unlike equities, bonds are issued by both private corporations and government entities. The China Government Bond (CGB) market has, in particular, grown very large over this period. That is why I believe individual investors will get more involved in bond market investing in the future.

We can also see there are a diversity of issuers of CNY bonds in the domestic market and different platforms for trading these instruments. (Note that ‘interbank’ is largely meaning ‘OTC’).

The market has been designated into two major categories:

  1. Government/quasi-government bond
  2. Credit bond

We see that the trading convention can be Interbank (OTC) or via the Stock Exchange (SSE or SzSE). We also see the regulatory body is different for different classes of issuers. Lastly, we see a column for money-market instruments (commercial paper). This market structure is quite similar to the market structure in other major bond markets around the world.

In Conclusion

Individual investors in China have not invested in bonds as much as they have in stocks or real estate. But bond markets are growing and give you a chance to diversify your investments. With this introductory article and the following four, more technical articles, we hope this gives you the interest and confidence to look at bonds as a potential investment opportunity and source of diversification.

John D. Evans, CFA (author) has over 24 years’ experience in the international capital markets working with issuers of securities and investors around the world. He has designed and taught Master’s programmes in investment management at universities in the UK and China. He was most recently Professor of Investment Management at XJTLU in Suzhou. He now manages SEIML, a consultancy to early-stage companies in China.

Jina Zhu (translator) did her Master’s in Economics in France and is fluent in Mandarin, English and French. She also works at SEIML supporting early-stage companies grow and raise capital in China.

1 August 2019

Benny Cao, CFA

Manager, Investment Management

Benny has worked in the financial markets of China with an emphasis on fixed income, currency and asset-liability management.  He is currently Vice President of Longly Capital, a medium-sized, Ningbo-based private fund management company. The firm’s strategies include various types of fixed income portfolio management and convertible bond portfolio management. In addition, Benny offers financial investment services to professional investors such as Fund of Funds (FoF) of securities companies, enterprise investors and high net worth (HNW) individuals.

Benny has also been active on the commercial side of the securities business managing client business development strategies, marketing programmes and roadshows and developing and delivering financial markets training programmes for small and medium-sized banks and other financial institutions.

Benny is fluent in Mandarin, English and Japanese.

Jina Zhu, CFA Institute, Investment Foundations

Manager, Corporate Relations

Since returning from graduate studies in France to China in spring of 2014, Jina has been continually working in the field of e-commerce and its applications to the financial, entertainment and automotive industries. She is a multi-functional talent and fluent in Mandarin, English and French.

Jina is SEIML’s key relationship manager between foreign clients and the Chinese administrative authorities and has held many responsibilities dealing with international companies and executives operating in China.  As a result, she manages all of the company’s Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) activities with clients

With her graduate degree in economics and completion of the Investment Foundations certificate from CFA Institute, she has the knowledge to assist foreign companies in China market research, including reviews of potential customers, suppliers or other third parties.  She is also quite savvy in the use of Chinese social media.

Jina is fluent in Mandarin, English and French.

John D. Evans, CFA

Founder & Director

John spent the first 24 years of his career in investment banking, first in Toronto, briefly in New York and then London.  He was involved in DCM, ECM and strategic investment advisory to large funds in EMEA.

In 2004 he moved into academia and designed and ran MSc programs in investment management at universities in the UK and China. He also created and managed one of the larger financial professional training organizations in Europe while at the UK university (that was a JV partner in the training firm).

In 2016, John returned to industry to work with start-ups and various platforms and eco systems to support these early and middle stage companies. Initially he pursued this venture in the Shanghai region but then moved to Hong Kong in 2024 to build SEIML’s footprint in Southeast Asia. John is also a Director of the Hong Kong Founder Institute (FI) eco system and Program Director for the FI ASEAN Fintech accelerator.